Search: “Buy A Car”

We found 13 results for your search.

Australia’s pesky fee for debit card purchases may be about to disappear. What happens next-

Extra charge when paying using a card can add more than $12 to the cost of a school laptop, and $6.40 to a car service
Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcastJonathan Barrett Senior business reporterTue 15 Oct 2024 10.00 EDTLast modified on Tue 15 Oct 2024 16.59 EDTShareIt might be chump change when it comes to buying a coffee, but the surcharge on debit purchases adds up to billions of dollars a year – and it could be about to disappear.
Australia’s payments sector could be overhauled amid a government pledge to reform a system of fee charges that is deeply unpopular with consumers already grappling with punishing living costs.
While the Albanese government has flagged its intention to ban debit card surcharges, it will also consider wider measures flowing out of a Reserve Bank review of the sector that started on Tuesday.
What happens next?


Why is there a sudden focus on card fees?As the Independent Payment Forum notes, debit card fees can add more than $12 to the cost of a school laptop, and $6.40 to a car service.
Card payments now account for the lion’s share of transactions, with about 80% of consumer payments conducted via debit, credit, prepaid and charge cards, RBA data shows.
But a complicated system of opaque fees has long perplexed consumers, who might not know they are paying a surcharge until they tap their card. This disproportionately affects younger Australians, given they use cards more often than older cohorts.
Shoppers have also found they are often charged the same amount for a debit or credit transaction, even though they rightly assume the latter is more expensive to process.
All up, Australia’s banks, payment platforms and global card companies charge $6.9bn in fees a year, according to the Independent Payments Forum, which are costs either paid by businesses or passed to customers.
Transaction fees in Australia are higher than in several comparable economies such as the UK, but lower than in the US. The Biden administration is trying to combat high card charges as part of a wider campaign to tackle high consumer prices.


What is the solution?While banning surcharges on debit transactions would be a relief to consumers, there are concerns businesses, especially smaller ones, will need to bear the transaction cost or raise their prices.
The RBA, which has regulatory powers over the payments sector, said in its discussion paper that the average transaction fee paid by small merchants is around three times that paid by larger ones.
Shoppers to no longer pay fees when using debit cards under new Albanese government planRead moreThis is because they generally cannot negotiate the same types of deals with payments networks as big businesses.
The ability for the government to ban debit surcharges therefore relies on broader reforms to lower transaction costs for small businesses.
“These two issues are linked as merchants would be less likely to surcharge consumers if card payment costs were lower,” the RBA says.
It says a debit surcharge ban may prompt payment platforms to price debit and credit card transactions differently. 
For consumers, this would mean debit transactions are free, and credit card payments are charged a higher rate. The measure could also stir competition among payment platforms to offer businesses more competitive rates on debit transactions, given merchants will no longer be able to pass the fees to their customers.
The RBA has invited feedback on whether all card surcharges should be banned, but notes that this could drive a shift towards more credit card transactions, which would also increase transaction costs for businesses.
The RBA is also considering making “least-cost routing”, a policy designed to process payments via the cheapest network – usually Eftpos – a default setting for merchants’ terminals, which should decrease costs.


Who are the winners and losers?The government’s proposed ban sparked an immediate sell-off in payments platforms, with shares in SmartPay Holdings and Tyro Payments suffering double-digit share price falls on Tuesday. 
The Tyro chief executive, Jon Davey, said in a statement that consumers should not pay excessive surcharges, nor should businesses fund the consumer benefits that come with high-cost cards and loyalty programs. 
“We support any review that assesses the true cost of card acceptance, including both debit and credit, for the fair regulation of payment acceptance in Australia,” Davey said.
Many payment platforms, including the US company Square, design packages for businesses that blend fees for debit and credit charges, with the costs passed to customers.
This model could be disrupted by a ban on debit surcharges because it relies on subsidising credit card transactions by charging debit card users far more than the cost of the transaction.
It’s unclear what impact the government’s proposed ban would have on the major card networks, Visa and Mastercard, which were contacted for comment.
The RBA review, which is designed to increase transparency and competition in the payments sector, could fast-track a shift to alternative payment options such as “pay by bank”. This system is a type of direct debit which cuts card networks out of the process and should be cheaper for merchants.
Australia’s banking sector broadly supports a ban on debit surcharges, which means there is little opposition to the government banning the unpopular fees.
“This would be a win for consumers and lead to more clarity and certainty for them,” the Australian Banking Association CEO, Anna Bligh, said.

Israel proposes two harsh conditions for truce in Lebanon, but is slapped in the face by the United States_1

As tensions continue to escalate between Hezbollah and the Israeli military, the situation in southern Lebanon remains volatile. On October 21, thick smoke could be seen rising over the city of Khiam, as reported by Reuters. According to a report from Axios on October 20, which cited two US officials and two Israeli officials, Israel submitted a document to the United States outlining stringent conditions to halt its military operations in Lebanon last week. US envoy Amos Hochstein visited Beirut on October 21 with plans to discuss diplomatic solutions to the conflict and Israel’s demands. However, these conditions conflict with United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701, and US officials believe that Lebanon and the international community are unlikely to agree.

Israeli officials stated that one of the conditions for a ceasefire with Hezbollah, allowing civilian returns to the Israel-Lebanon border area, includes the Israeli military being permitted to conduct “active enforcement actions” to ensure that Hezbollah does not rearm or rebuild military infrastructure in southern Lebanon. Another demand is for the Israeli Air Force to have freedom of movement within Lebanese airspace.

This document was sent by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s close adviser, Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, who drafted it following discussions with the Israeli Defense Ministry and military. Dermer sent the document to Hochstein on October 17.

However, these demands contradict UNSC Resolution 1701, which established that after the cessation of the 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah, the Lebanese Armed Forces and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) were to enforce the ceasefire. One US official remarked that these Israeli conditions would significantly undermine Lebanese sovereignty, leading Lebanon and the international community to likely reject them.

Israeli officials argue their point hinges on the necessity to strengthen the enforcement of the earlier resolution: “If the Lebanese Army and UNIFIL do more, the Israeli military will have to do less, and vice versa.” Neither the White House nor Israel’s embassy in the US have commented on these developments.

Hochstein is expected to meet with Lebanese caretaker Prime Minister Mikati and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, among others. Berri stated on October 20 that Hochstein’s trip represents the last chance before the US elections to reach a resolution regarding the conflict in Lebanon, emphasizing a consensus on the existing resolution in Lebanon and rejecting any modifications.

Meanwhile, the conflict intensified again on October 20, as reported by the Lebanese National News Agency that evening. Israeli forces targeted bombings of financial institutions suspected of funding Hezbollah, with 11 bombings occurring in southern Beirut and other strikes focused on the eastern Bekaa Valley and southern Lebanon.

These attacks primarily targeted Al-Qard Al-Hassan, an institution that the US alleges Hezbollah uses to manage its finances. According to the Jerusalem Post, Hezbollah reportedly buys arms using deposits from this institution.

In addition, a report from the World Health Organization (WHO) noted that up to 1,000 women and children are expected to be evacuated from the Gaza Strip to Europe soon, where they will receive emergency medical care, as stated by WHO’s European Regional Office Director, Dr. Hans Kluge, on October 21.

Furthermore, Israeli military operations continue in the Jabalia refugee camp in northern Gaza, with local residents and healthcare workers reporting that Israeli forces bombed residential buildings and surrounded schools and shelters designated for displaced persons on the same day.

Progress of the -Aunt Mei Case– All the abducted children have been found, but -Aunt Mei- has not yet been brought to justice

**Interview with Ouyang Guoqi: A Father’s Heartfelt Journey to Reunite with His Son After 19 Years of Separation**

In the ongoing developments of the “Mei Yi case,” all nine abducted children have been found, yet the infamous “Mei Yi” remains at large. Ouyang Jiahao, who was taken by traffickers at the age of three, met his biological parents when he was 22.

On October 25, Ouyang Guoqi, Jiahao’s father, shared his emotional reunion with Tencent News, recalling how he traveled from Hunan to Zengcheng, Guangzhou on September 20 to see his son, who he hadn’t seen for 19 long years. “Jiahao is a bit taller than me, and his eyes resemble his mother’s,” he remarked. He wasn’t the only parent experiencing this bittersweet moment; another abducted child, Zhong Bin, reunited with his family the same day.

Jiahao was the last of the nine children involved in the “Mei Yi case” to be located. This case has gained nationwide attention, and it was the police from Zengcheng who took charge of the investigation. Officer Wang Ting from the Nanchang Railway Public Security Bureau played a pivotal role, utilizing facial recognition technology to identify Jiahao and Zhong Bin.

“The families of these two children live just about 2 kilometers apart,” Wang said. Zhong Bin was abducted to Zijin County, while Jiahao’s trafficker had connections in nearby Meizhou City.

The mastermind behind the abduction of Jiahao and the other eight children, Zhang Weiping, was executed in April 2023. During his confession, he revealed that he used “Mei Yi” to find buyers for each of the nine boys he trafficked—hence the case’s moniker.

In a prior attempt to gather leads, the Zengcheng police released a composite sketch of “Mei Yi” in 2017. However, her identity remains elusive.

**Assistance from a Young Railway Officer: Rapid Identification of Suspects**

During a phone interview on October 26, Ouyang Guoqi recounted how he and his wife received a call from Zengcheng police in mid-September and made their way to meet their son. After finally breaking bread together, they returned home to Hunan, leaving Jiahao to continue his work in Guangzhou.

“He hasn’t called us ‘Mom and Dad’ yet,” Ouyang Guoqi said, understanding the emotional complexity of their situation. “It’s important to give him time to adjust; there’s no rush.”

Originally from Ningyuan County, Hunan Province, Ouyang Guoqi and his family moved to Zengcheng in 2005 for work. They rented a home in Xian Village, where he worked at a construction site while his wife, Ouyang Chunyu, cared for three-year-old Jiahao.

The month before the disappearance, a man in his thirties moved in next door, introducing himself as being from Sichuan. On May 26, Ouyang Chunyu was tidying up when she noticed Jiahao wasn’t playing outside anymore. After inquiring with neighbors, she learned that he had been taken by the man next door.

That man was Zhang Weiping, who had a history of child trafficking. “He often visited our home and would even bring treats for my son,” Ouyang Chunyu recalled after the incident.

According to Zhang’s confession, he took Jiahao outside the village, boarded a bus to Zengcheng, and met with “Mei Yi” beside the bus depot. They then traveled to a hotel in Zijin County, where he later sold Jiahao to a couple for 13,000 yuan, keeping 1,000 yuan as a referral fee for “Mei Yi.”

After reporting their son’s disappearance, the Ouyang family pressed the police to reveal the findings. Zhang was apprehended in 2016, but it wasn’t until May 2024 that seven of the nine kidnapped children were found, leaving only Jiahao and Zhong Bin still unaccounted for at that time.

In November 2017, Guoqi and others gathered at a hotel in Guangzhou to discuss the search for their missing children. Zhong Bin’s father, Zhong Dingyou, has been searching for his son since the day he was taken by Zhang Weiping in December 2004 when Zhong Bin was just one year old.

**Youthful Determination Combines with Technology to Unite Families**

In his quest to locate his son, Zhong Dingyou reached out to Officer Wang Ting at the Nanchang Railway Police. Wang, who is part of the millennial generation, has honed his skills in big data and facial recognition to find missing persons. He detailed the meticulous process he followed in locating Zhong Bin and Jiahao on October 25.

“Zhong Bin’s father contacted me around September 3 and sent over photos of his son. By the 9th, we had a breakthrough,” Wang explained. As he collaborated with Zengcheng police, he discovered that Jiahao was still missing and ultimately used facial recognition technology to find both boys.

After comparing DNA from suspects, it confirmed that they were indeed Zhong Bin and Ouyang Jiahao.

“Words can’t express my gratitude to Officer Wang and all those who helped us,” Zhong Dingyou said. On September 22, he joyously met his son after 20 years. On the same day, Guoqi also met Jiahao, marking the conclusion of a long chapter of despair.

**The Quest Continues: The People Behind the Crimes**

With all nine abducted children now found and Zhang Weiping executed, the focus shifts to “Mei Yi.” The case sparked public interest, largely due to the relentless search efforts of parents like Shen Junliang, the father of another victim, Shen Cong.

Shen Junliang, who lived in Zengcheng, dedicated himself entirely to finding his son after he was stolen at just one year old. For over a decade, he crisscrossed various cities, distributing thousands of flyers, yet his son remained missing.

In July 2017, he found artist Lin Yuhui, known for creating a composite of a suspect in a high-profile missing person case in the U.S., who helped to draw a likeness of Shen Cong as a teenager. After Lin’s involvement drew media attention, the police identified several suspects involved in the case, including Zhang and others from the same village in Guizhou Province.

In December 2021, Zhang and his accomplices were sentenced to death for their roles in multiple kidnappings. The attention to detail and persistence of families, coupled with advancements in policing techniques, have led to many successful recoveries of abducted children.

To date, not only have Jiahao and Zhong Bin reunited with their families, but the resolution of this ongoing and tragic case raises questions about the still-mysterious “Mei Yi.” Despite the convictions, the identity of “Mei Yi” remains unsolved, adding to the haunting complexities of the case that has resonated deeply within the community.

As the investigation continues, families await justice for their lost loved ones and hope that “Mei Yi” will be brought to light.

From plastic bags to shoelaces, the art in this California show is made entirely of trash

The Institute for Contemporary Art in San Francisco has launched an intriguing exhibition featuring ‘alchemized’ art crafted from everyday items such as toothpaste caps, zip ties, broken computer keys, and perfume spray tubes.

We had the chance to speak with renowned artist Miguel Arzabe, whose journey in the art world has been quite inspiring. He recalls visiting various art shows across the U.S. as a young artist, but it was the exhibit catalogues that truly captivated him. “I was fascinated by those documents,” he shared. “That’s what inspired me to create my own artwork using the books themselves.”

Arzabe took pages from these catalogues, cutting them into thin strips, which he then intricately wove into a large Andean tapestry titled Last Weaving, completed in 2018. “It’s a timeless piece,” he declared. His previous works included tapestries made from used movie posters and old pamphlets. Although he initially struggled to find buyers, his unique blend of ancient patterns with contemporary materials ultimately found its audience.

Now, Last Weaving is set to hang from the ceiling of the ICA, part of The Poetics of Dimensions exhibition, which showcases art made entirely from found and discarded objects. Curator Larry Ossei-Mensah noted, “These are all materials we recognize, but the artists have alchemized them to provoke thoughts on consumerism and the ability of art to breathe new life into discarded items.”

Ossei-Mensah collaborated closely with the museum’s director, Alison Gass, over several months to bring this exhibition to fruition. Originally intended for a former school gym in Dogpatch, the museum received a last-minute offer for a new space in a downtown building, known as The Cube, a former bank that has now become a hub for such innovative displays.

Gass emphasized the goal of the exhibition: “We want to help viewers navigate the world through artistic practice.” As artworks were being unpacked, she pointed to a striking abstract painting by Anthony Akinbola, crafted entirely from carefully stitched durags.

The exhibition challenges perceptions of desirability and shines a light on the often-overlooked efforts of waste collectors, revealing the global waste supply chain. One notable piece is a nearly life-sized depiction by artist Hugo McCloud, portraying a woman in a pink coat weighed down by a load on her back. McCloud’s travels have inspired his work, where he collected plastic sacks from around the world to showcase their multi-functional uses. He meticulously cut and pressed these plastic pieces onto canvas to create powerful visual statements.

As McCloud puts it, “I am concerned with social inequality, and through my art, I want to expose what we tend to ignore.” He aims to foster conversations that allow viewers to confront uncomfortable truths.

Arzabe’s work, in its own way, is a response to the tech boom in the Bay Area. “So much money was directed towards new technology,” he reflected. “I wanted to show that value could come from humble materials.”

The Poetics of Dimensions will be on display at the Institute of Contemporary Art in San Francisco from October 25 to February 23.

(Economic Observer) China’s existing mortgage interest rates are adjusted in batches to help the real estate market stop falling and stabilize

On October 25th, major Chinese banks including Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Agricultural Bank of China, Bank of China, China Construction Bank, Postal Savings Bank, and Bank of Communications implemented a significant adjustment to existing mortgage rates. This action followed a directive to reduce the adjustment range for applicable existing mortgage rates to no less than “a 30 basis point cut,” specifically targeting those rates that initially exceeded this threshold.

According to reports, the adjustments were carried out uniformly by the banks, allowing the vast majority of borrowers to benefit without needing to visit bank branches or actively modify settings online. As a result of this mass adjustment, existing mortgage rates are expected to decrease by an average of around 0.5 percentage points, which could save borrowers approximately 150 billion yuan in interest payments, benefiting around 50 million households and 150 million residents.

Experts believe that this policy adjustment will generate a series of positive effects on the macroeconomic landscape.

First, there’s an effective boost to market confidence. The consistent concern regarding high existing mortgage rates has long been a focal point for the public, especially as the economy faces downward pressure. The high burden of home loans has been a significant source of stress for many families. This policy change is seen as a proactive response to public worries. The capital markets reacted positively to this critical moment of rate adjustment.

Secondly, the policy provides substantial support for both consumer spending and investment. For individual households, the reduction in mortgage interest translates directly into increased disposable income. Given that the LPR for loans over five years has decreased cumulatively by 0.6 percentage points this year, associated mortgage rates may see a reduction of up to 1.45 percentage points after repricing. With reduced repayment pressure, borrowers will have more disposable income to meet diverse consumption needs.

This move is particularly beneficial for young families, alleviating financial pressure and boosting consumer confidence. For individual business owners, lower loan costs can lead to improved cash flow, allowing them to reinvest savings into expanding their operations.

Lastly, this amendment is likely to aid in stabilizing the real estate market. With reduced existing mortgage rates, buyers are less concerned about the widening gap between new and old mortgage rates, which helps to release pent-up housing demand and supports a stable and healthy real estate market.

Following the introduction of policies aimed at lowering existing mortgage rates, there has been a noticeable increase in viewings and transactions for new and second-hand homes, particularly in first-tier cities like Beijing. According to a major bank, prepayments on mortgages in October decreased by 20% compared to the month prior, before the implementation of the new policy.

Market observers suggest that this recent package of real estate support measures has improved consumer expectations for home purchases, combined with local governments actively enforcing tailored strategies, signaling a potential bottoming out of the real estate market.

Don’t book expensive driving tests through reseller sites, warns RAC

Learners trying to beat backlog can pay up to £195 with brokers who buy up slots and sell them on, according to motoring organisation
Mabel Banfield-NwachiTue 15 Oct 2024 19.01 EDTShareThe RAC has issued fresh warnings to desperate learner drivers trying to beat the backlog by booking tests through unregulated websites after it found they could be paying up to four times the going rate.
The average waiting time for a test across England, Scotland and Wales is about four and a half months and many learners have turned to brokers who book out slots and resell the tests for hundreds of pounds.
According to the RAC, some sites are reselling tests for up to £195. One London-based learner said she paid just under £500 for a test in May 2023, including use of an instructor’s car, and about £400 for a second test after she failed the first.
A practical exam booked through the official Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) website costs £62 on weekdays, and £75 on evenings, weekends and bank holidays.
skip past newsletter promotionSign up to First Edition
Free daily newsletterOur morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters
Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotion
‘They have you over a barrel’: how scammers, touts and bots took over driving testsRead moreThird-party brokers are exploiting the frenzied hunt for tests and “cheating the system” by using automated software known as bots to book available slots on the DVSA website the moment they become available, faster than any human could, the RAC head of policy, Simon Williams, said.
More than 1.7m practical driving tests are typically carried out each year, but an increase in demand, industrial action and the Covid backlog has meant waiting times have drastically increased.
An estimated 500,000 learners had their driving courses disrupted or paused their lessons during the Covid lockdowns, which has had a big knock-on effect on test waiting times.
60th time lucky: learner driver breaks UK record for sitting theory test Read moreThe DVSA has been taking steps to clamp down on the “black economy”, but many slots can still be bought through third parties online. Since January 2023, the DVSA, which is responsible for the driving test, has issued 283 warnings and 746 suspensions and has closed 689 businesses for misuse of its booking service.
However, tests are being sold via encrypted WhatsApp chats and sellers often use the disappearing message function so conversations are deleted and not traceable, according to the RAC.
Williams added: “It’s terrible that ‘brokers’ using software to reserve tests faster than a human possibly could are making it so hard for learners to book test slots.
“Definitive action needs to be taken to prevent bots booking tests and then selling them on to desperate learners for crazy amounts of money. This leads to genuine slots being wasted and learners, who are ready to take their tests, missing out and having to wait months for a chance to become a qualified driver. It’s no wonder some learners end up booking test slots before they’re ready.”

Seize the North American market with 22% off on two BenQ projectors

In a recent interview, we explored BenQ’s exciting new promotional efforts in North America, celebrating the Double Ten Festival. This marks a first for the company, which has launched significant discounts on two of its mobile projectors: the GS50 LED Camping Projector and the GP100A LED Mobile Projector, with prices dropping as low as 28% off.

As a response to increasing consumer demand during Amazon’s Prime Day, BenQ is seizing this opportunity not just to celebrate but to expand its footprint in the North American market. The promotional period runs from October 10 to 17, with the offer available for online orders with home delivery across the United States.

BenQ has shifted its focus towards household products in recent years, actively developing offerings that cater to everyday living, gaming, and entertainment needs. With many North American families adopting a camping lifestyle, these mobile projectors provide an ideal solution for outdoor movies, as well as entertaining experiences at home. Their combination of high-quality visuals and sound enhances the overall quality of life.

The GS50 LED Camping Projector is designed to be portable and rugged, featuring water resistance (IPX2) and operating on AC 100 to 240V with a power consumption of 65W. It boasts a resolution of 1080P and brightness of 500 ANSI lumens. With its built-in Android 10.0 and an Android TV stick (QS02) included, it is perfect for spontaneous outings.

Originally priced at $799, the GS50 is now available for $599, accompanied by an outdoor carry bag and a 100-inch projection screen—a $200 value. However, only 40 units are available, and interested buyers can access this deal by visiting the provided link and entering the discount code “Taiwan1010GS50.”

The second featured product, the GP100A LED Mobile Projector, transforms small spaces into luxurious mini-theaters, projecting a 120-inch image from just 3.2 meters away. Also equipped with the Android TV stick, this projector offers a powerful brightness of 1000 ANSI lumens, enabling crisp, vibrant color reproduction. It includes a 2.1 channel 20W speaker and features an automatic game mode for seamless operation.

The GP100A’s regular price of $899 has been discounted to $649, which reflects a 28% reduction. It also comes with the same bundle offer of a $200 Elite 100-inch projection screen, a carry bag, a pillow, and a cushion. This promotion is available through the provided link, using the code “Taiwan1010GP100A,” and is valid until October 17.

With innovative products like these, BenQ is clearly focused on enhancing both the camping experience and home entertainment for families across the United States.

‘They’re killing us’- Aberdeen braces for end to North Sea oil as clean energy plan takes shape

The granite city has weathered many storms over the years but people there now fear the impact of the government’s tax plans on the local economy and jobs
Jillian AmbroseSat 19 Oct 2024 08.00 EDTLast modified on Sat 19 Oct 2024 13.38 EDTShare‘We’ve all accepted that the North Sea is declining,” says Roy, 70, a taxi driver working in Aberdeen for the past 20 years. “Over the years there have been a few huge market crashes but we always recover. This time, it’s a real decline.”
Drive along the granite city’s Union Street and there are dozens of shuttered shops, some empty for almost a decade following one of the longest routs in the history of the oil market, which brought oil prices to lows of less than $30 (£23) a barrel in 2016, less than half its value today.
The capital of the UK’s oil and gas industry has weathered the volatility of the global oil markets since the North Sea heyday in the 1970s; its fortunes tied to the rise and fall of the price of Brent crude. But it is now less than two weeks away from a reckoning with the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, who many expect to set out tax changes in the budget that could hasten the end of the North Sea industry and threaten the 200,000 jobs it supports.
“They’re killing us,” says Darren, 50, an oil rig worker for the past 22 years. He declines to give his full name for fear of losing his job with a major oil company. “This government is going to do to the North Sea what Margaret Thatcher did to the mines. We all know it: this is the end for the UK oil industry. We just don’t know when.”
The Labour party stormed to power in July with bold plans to end Britain’s fossil fuel legacy and emerge as a “clean energy superpower”. Within days of forming a government, the party confirmed the UK would bring an end to new licences for oil and gas projects.
The decision has cemented Britain’s climate leadership in a crucial decade for tackling rising carbon emissions – but this is cold comfort for workers such as Darren, a father of two, who fear for the future of their industry.
“Imagine losing your job, losing the roof over your kids’ heads, and all to save carbon emissions that are a drop in the ocean compared to China’s? The best I can hope for is to hang on and perhaps in four years this government will be voted out,” he says.
‘A multibillion-pound paradox’Alongside plans to ban new oil and gas licences, Labour came to power with an election pledge to toughen the windfall tax regime put in place after a surge in market prices following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. It promised to raise the energy profits levy by increasing the headline tax rate companies pay on their oil and gas profits by three percentage points, to 78%.
Labour plans to use the higher taxes taken from the North Sea to help fund its ambition to turn the UK into a green energy “superpower” in line with its goal of making the UK’s electricity system net zero by 2030.
The party also promised to close the “loophole” left by the previous government that enabled oil and gas firms to reduce their taxes through investment allowances. These allowances, which are commonplace in tax legislation, allow companies to deduct the value of their investments from their profits – enabling companies to pay less tax and offering incentive for further investment.
The combined impact of higher headline taxes and lower tax relief risks devastating the sector’s predicted investment over the second half of this decade, according to the industry’s trade association, Offshore Energies UK (OEUK). It has warned that the changes could wipe out £12bn in tax receipts and jeopardise 35,000 industry jobs.
Stifel, an investment bank, believes that while the move would increase Treasury revenues in the short term, the wider economic impact would mean a sharp decline in takings from 2029 and the loss of 100,000 jobs in total.
“There is a multibillion-pound paradox here,” the bank said in a research note this year. “Any further increases to the windfall tax take, especially through the removal of investment allowances, would result in substantially lower investment and, therefore, lower tax income for the UK, fewer jobs, loss of skills for the green transition, higher emissions, and the export of jobs, skills and the UK’s energy security to other energy-producing countries.”
Russell Borthwick, chief executive of Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce at their offices.View image in fullscreenRussell Borthwick, chief executive of Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce at their offices. Photograph: Murdo MacLeod/The GuardianThe Aberdeen Chamber of Commerce has warned that the spectre of Labour’s budget is being felt far beyond the energy sector. Its most recent quarterly economic survey of more than 5,000 companies showed that concerns over taxation had rocketed up the risk register; more than 60% of companies in the north-east of Scotland have cited the government’s tax policies as a barrier to growth, up from 48% just three months ago.
“The Treasury understands the potential impact,” says Russell Borthwick, the chamber’s chief executive. “But I do wonder if they’ve painted themselves into a difficult corner with these policies.”
“The fact is, there are no windfall profits being made in the North Sea today. There was a short period of time when Russia invaded Ukraine and there were oil prices above $100 a barrel. But Celtic Football Club made bigger profits than our largest North Sea oil producers last year. It looks like they’re now being singled out for political reasons, rather than fiscal reasons,” he says.
The wider regional economy is still “inextricably linked to the oil and gas economy”, which means the knock-on effect “will be felt from professional services to the retail industry to cab drivers. It will be more marked here than anywhere else.”
Gabby Robertson, 24, has worked in high-street fashion stores for four years and has noticed the decline of Aberdeen’s retail sector, which was once flush with oil and gas money.
“We used to have people come in and spend £400 to £500, but we see that a lot less now. People are coming in to buy single items or they tell us they’ll have to come back at payday and ask about paying on Klarna (the buy now, pay later platform). It’s still better here than on Union Street. Shops there have closed and there’s nothing to replace them. It’s getting harder and harder for small businesses to survive,” she says.
Economic catastrophe is not inevitable. Most of the gloomier projections cited by the industry assume that all investment allowances will be scrapped, although this has not been explicitly proposed by the government. The industry is hoping that some allowances remain intact to help prolong investment in the declining industry and allow its workers the chance to transition to Britain’s low-carbon future.
‘Where is the transition?’At a busy heliport near Aberdeen airport, dozens of rig workers wait to board the helicopters that will take them up to 100 miles off the Scottish coast to the giant oil and gas platforms that extract the UK’s fossil fuels.
Most will work 12- to 13-hour days offshore for three weeks, before returning to their homes in Scotland and the north of England for a three-week break. On this grey October day, bad weather has kept many helicopters on the ground, and talk of the government’s upcoming budget has darkened the mood.
One oil rig worker, aged 53, who asked not to be named, has travelled to Aberdeen from his home in Lincolnshire each month for the past 30 years to work in the North Sea. After only a five-day break, he has returned for a one-week stint as part of his plan “to fit in more work while it’s around”.
“If Rachel Reeves does increase taxes for the North Sea then that’s another hit to the pockets of the oil companies that operate here. Harbour Energy, one of the biggest players, let 350 people go as part of a restructuring last year. I had hoped to keep working until I’m 60 but if I can get another five years I should be OK,” he says.
“It’s definitely the beginning of the end,” says Bob, 52. “Platforms that could have kept producing for years longer will shut. The one I work on will close in two years. It’s been 12 years that I’ve been working on the rigs after the refinery I worked at was left to close. I’ll be OK because I’ve had a long career but I think about the guys with young families who could lose their jobs and it just doesn’t seem right.
“It seems crazy to me that the North Sea faces windfall taxes but the likes of Amazon can get away with paying very little. Shouldn’t it be the same for all companies across the country? Isn’t that fair?”
Paul, a rig worker from Dundee, is one of many who fear that Britain’s plans to transition to a green economy will leave behind those who helped to build the fossil fuel economy of the past. “What I would ask the government is this: what’s the proposed solution to the problem that all this is going to create? They talk about a green transition but where’s the transition for us? All I hear is ‘woke’ jargon.”
The government’s plan to safeguard a “just transition” for Britain’s fossil fuel workers took a step forward last week with plans to launch a “skills passport” to help oil and gas workers to move into jobs in renewables such as offshore wind. From early next year, the passport, which will be overseen by industry bodies RenewableUK and OEUK, with the support of the UK and Scottish governments, aims to align standards, recognise transferable skills and qualifications such as oil and gas safety standards, and map out career pathways for suitable roles.
About 90% of oil and gas workers have transferable skills for offshore renewable jobs, according to OEUK – but not everyone is eager to make the switch. Barry, an oil worker in his late 30s, says he has “absolutely no interest” in retraining to work in Britain’s burgeoning offshore wind sector. For a start, the work is seasonal – with most maintenance taking place in the summer months. The pay is also not quite as good, he says.
“And it’s just not for me, I don’t like heights,” he shrugs. “If I had plans to stay in the North Sea I’d be worried. But I think I’m going to go out to work in Qatar. I’m not the one you need to worry about; I can leave the North Sea and work somewhere else. These big oil companies can leave the North Sea and work somewhere else. But the services firms – the supply chains serving the North Sea – which can’t leave are the ones who are going to feel the pain.”
The sun rises behind a redundant oil platform moored in the Firth of Forth near Kirkcaldy, Fife.View image in fullscreenThe sun rises behind a redundant oil platform moored in the Firth of Forth near Kirkcaldy, Fife. Photograph: Jane Barlow/PAA green Aberdeen?Like many oil workers, larger supply chain and oilfield service firms have already begun to eye the new oil and gas frontiers in the Middle East, Africa and South America as the UK’s reserves dwindle.
The loss of skills and resources that could be put to use helping to meet the UK’s green energy ambitions is a major concern for industry observers. At the same time, smaller firms without an international reach risk going bust if the gap between the end of Britain’s fossil fuel era and the full economic benefits of its green future becomes too wide.
“I don’t think I’ve ever seen an issue unite the trade unions, businesses, public sector and academics quite like this one,” Borthwick says. “We’re in danger of losing our industrial supply chains to overseas oil and gas projects before there’s a chance for them to benefit from the opportunities of the green economy.”
The answer, according to Borthwick, is to allow more breathing room for the oil companies to keep investing in their existing projects while the industry winds down, while speeding up the green agenda to provide a future for the region’s small businesses.
The government’s public energy company, GB Energy, which will be headquartered in Aberdeen, could use its “convening power” to build a home for green industries in the city, he says. “We want that ecosystem. We want green companies to believe that Aberdeen is the place that they need to be.”
Reimagining Aberdeen as a green hub could prove to be the next chapter for a city uniquely poised at the centre of Britain’s energy transition. It is a reinvention the city is ready for, says Borthwick.
“You know, Aberdeen used to be a very serious place; but we’re changing. We’ve started to break out of the greyness of our granite past. It’s like we’re waking up. We’re relearning who we are,” he says.

Northern users may be compensated after rail firm broke fare evasion rules

Prosecutions of passengers accused of using 16-25 railcard for discounts at wrong time of day are being withdrawn
Nadeem BadshahMon 14 Oct 2024 14.26 EDTFirst published on Mon 14 Oct 2024 14.21 EDTShareRail passengers could be entitled to compensation after Northern was accused of breaking its fare evasion rules to prosecute commuters.
The train operator said on Monday all prosecutions of people accused of using a 16-25 railcard to obtain a discount at the wrong time of day were being withdrawn – with less than 25 previous cases being reviewed.
The company was criticised for prosecuting young people after they used their railcards in a way that would have saved a few pounds on morning journeys.
Under Northern rules, passengers with a railcard travelling on the wrong train must be offered the chance to pay back the deficit on the spot, the Telegraph reported.
A Northern spokesperson said: “We understand that fares and ticketing across the railway can, at times, be difficult to understand, and we are reviewing our processes for ensuring compliance with ticket and railcard terms and conditions. With regard to recent reported cases involving use of the 16-25 railcard with fares under £12 before 10am, we are withdrawing any live cases and will also look to review anyone who has been prosecuted previously on this specific issue.
“We are actively engaged with government and industry to simplify fares to help customers.”
Restrictions on a 16-25 railcard, which can also be bought by full-time students, mean discounts can only be applied to an “anytime” ticket before 10am if the fare is £12 or more, requiring cardholders to pay full fare for cheaper tickets.
However, there are exceptions to this rule: railcards can be used on early morning trains at a weekend, or during the months of July and August. Some rail users said the rules were confusing and they had fallen foul of the regulations after buying discounted tickets, unaware that their railcards were not valid.
Sam Williamson, 22, received a letter from Northern threatening him with prosecution over a £1.90 fare discrepancy after he mistakenly used his railcard on a morning train from Manchester to London on 5 September.
Last week, in a social media post seen by millions, Williamson told how he had received the notice from the government-owned operator. The engineering graduate from Glossop in Derbyshire said he was subsequently contacted by the train operator notifying him that it would “be taking no further steps” against him.
A Department for Transport spokesperson said: “We expect Northern and all operators to ensure their policy on ticketing is clear and fair for passengers at all times. Northern are reviewing the details of these cases and will report back to the department.
“It is clear that ticketing is far too complicated with a labyrinth of different fares and prices, which can be confusing for passengers. That’s why we have committed to the biggest overhaul of our railways in a generation, including simplifying fares to make travelling by train easier.”

‘Unlimited dollars’- how an Indiana hospital chain took over a region and jacked up prices

Parkview Health has spent over $600m building up its sprawling regional medical center in Fort Wayne, Indiana. Photograph: Rachel Von Art/The GuardianIn the nation’s most affordable metro area, getting hurt or sick is expensive
By George Joseph, Will Craft and Jessica GlenzaThu 17 Oct 2024 12.00 BSTLast modified on Thu 17 Oct 2024 12.02 BSTShareOn an October evening, Tom Frost was zooming down a dark state road on the northern edge of Indiana. The father of two had just finished his shift at a small town fiberglass factory. Now, he was doing what he loved, riding a Harley Davidson in his typical getup: black gloves, leather chaps, no helmet.
As Frost revved past the corn fields and thinning birch trees that led to his girlfriend’s house, a green pickup jerked off a side road and into his path. Frost didn’t have time. He hit the truck and flew backwards, leaving his body and small trails of blood on the asphalt, police photos show.
First responders loaded Frost, now incapacitated, onto a helicopter and flew him to the area’s biggest hospital, Parkview Health’s Regional Medical Center. The sprawling, near-million square foot campus had opened its doors a year earlier, the capital of a rapidly expanding empire of hospitals and doctors offices spreading out from Fort Wayne to the rural counties of the Indiana-Ohio borderlands.
Parkview Health’s doctors operated on Frost’s fractured right leg and face. Eventually, he woke up from his coma. But for weeks afterwards, he suffered from significant brain trauma. He called his mother, who spent days sitting beside his hospital bed, “Number 1”, not “Mom”. So about a month after the 2013 crash, when a hospital employee pulled aside his mother and asked her to sign an agreement promising to pay for “all” of her son’s charges, the 66-year-old retired bartender signed where she was told.
Frost’s mother didn’t know how much the bill was going to be. All she knew was that her son, who was uninsured, needed care. After Frost’s discharge, Parkview Health, a not-for-profit system, sent him a letter outlining how much it wanted: $629,386.50. Frost’s family was willing to pay, according to a subsequent court filing submitted by his attorney. But the bill was bigger than what they thought was reasonable. For example, after his high-level surgeries, Parkview transferred him to a skilled nursing facility, where he worked on his rehab and recovery for 55 days. For that period, the hospital wanted $144,487.73, effectively a daily charge of more than $2,600. An auditor hired by the family’s attorney identified thousands of dollars in billing errors in the hospital’s itemized statement, some of which the hospital later relented on. More significantly, going off of federal billing guidelines, the auditor concluded the “fair and reasonable value” of the services Frost received actually amounted to $255,903.45 – still a hefty sum, but only about 40% of what the hospital was demanding. After a two year legal battle that threatened to shed light on Parkview’s closely-guarded billing practices, the hospital had Frost sign a confidentiality agreement and settled the case for an undisclosed sum.
But the enormous hospital bill Parkview sent to Frost was not an aberration. Over more than a decade, Parkview Health has demanded that the people of north-eastern Indiana and north-western Ohio pay some of the highest prices of any hospital system in the country – despite being headquartered in Fort Wayne, Indiana, which currently ranks as the No 1 most affordable metro area to live in the United States. For 10 of the last 13 years, Parkview hospitals on average have been among the top 10% most expensive in the country, a Guardian US analysis of cost estimates based on data submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid shows.
Two pedestrians walk hand in hand into the Parkview Regional Medical Center View image in fullscreenSome staff refer to Parkview Regional Medical Center in private as ‘Emerald City’ for its ritzy amenities and green corporate branding. Photograph: Rachel Von Art/The GuardianParkview’s steep prices are the product of a more than two decade campaign by hospital executives to establish market dominance in Fort Wayne and to squeeze revenue from a pool of patients and employers who feel they have no better alternatives, according to interviews with more than 40 current and former Parkview employees, patients, local business leaders, lawmakers and competitors, as well as leaked audio recordings of meetings and hundreds of internal billing, patient and policy documents obtained by the Guardian.
During this period, Parkview has taken over six former rival hospitals and built up a network of almost 300 sites for its physicians and providers, forming a ring around its gleaming regional center, which some staff refer to in private as the “Big House” or “Emerald City” for its ritzy amenities and green corporate branding.
This consolidation, former employees say, has allowed Parkview to control referral flows, routing primary care patients to their own costly specialists and facilities, even if those patients could get the same services elsewhere for less. It has also increased Parkview’s leverage in negotiations with health insurance companies, as they bargain over procedure prices on behalf of employers that offer the insurers’ health plans to their workers.
Insurance industry sources say Parkview’s growing web of hospitals makes it hard for any insurer to offer a viable health plan locally without including the chain’s facilities in their network, an advantage that has helped the not-for-profit extract high prices and earn a reputation as one of the toughest negotiators in the state.
Not-for-profit healthcare has been good business for Parkview as it has been for hundreds of other ostensible charities across the US which operate nearly half of the nation’s hospitals. In exchange for generous tax breaks, these institutions are required to provide free and discounted care to poor patients, but many have faced criticism for skimping on charity care, demanding high prices and giving executives exorbitant salaries.
Since 2019, Parkview has raked in more than $2bn in revenue annually, enabling the system to give dozens of its executives and top doctors six and seven figure annual compensation packages. Before his retirement at the end of 2022, Parkview’s longtime CEO, an avowed Christian who publicly styled himself as a “servant” leader, took home nearly $3m from the not-for-profit, according to the system’s last publicly available IRS disclosure.
Parkview declined repeated requests in recent weeks to make its current CEO available for interview and chose not to respond to a series of detailed questions submitted by the Guardian several days ahead of publication. In response to criticism about its high prices, Parkview has previously pointed to its various charitable initiatives, its role as a leader in the region’s economic development, and the quality of its care – which varies by facility according to federal ratings. The system has also claimed that past studies of its prices have been “filled with inaccuracies” and “incomplete analyses”.
Graph of Parkview expansion, showing the extent of the system’s growth.Parkview’s expansion in Fort Wayne, a mid-sized, midwestern city surrounded by miles of corn fields and manufacturing plants, reflects a larger trend of consolidation that has transformed America’s once mostly locally run healthcare system and ratcheted up its costs for more than a generation. Since the 1990s, hospital systems across the US – for and not-for-profit alike – have relentlessly chased after market power, executing nearly 2,000 mergers with little pushback from overwhelmed federal antitrust regulators and indifferent state authorities. Research from the American Medical Association found that by 2013, 97% of healthcare markets in the US had little competition and were highly consolidated under Department of Justice antitrust guidelines. By 2021, that figure had risen to 99%.
With consolidation, academic researchers have consistently found significant increases in prices. A 2012 research survey concluded that when hospitals merge in concentrated markets price hikes were “typically quite large, most exceeding 20 percent”. A 2019 study found that prices at hospitals enjoying local monopoly power were 12% higher than those in markets with at least four competitors. A study released earlier this year identified dozens of hospital mergers that it said regulators could have flagged as likely to diminish competition and raise prices. Those mergers did, in fact, result in average price hikes of 5% or more, the researchers found.
A view of Parkview’s sprawling campus in Fort Wayne, Ind.View image in fullscreenParkview’s growing ring of hospitals increased its leverage in contract negotiations with health insurers. Photograph: Rachel Von Art/The GuardianRising healthcare costs don’t just hurt patients. They also squeeze local employers, who have to choose between wages, headcount and insurance costs – decisions that low-wage workers pay for down the line. A working paper from earlier this summer found that every 1% increase in healthcare prices, driven by hospital mergers, lowered both employment and payroll at companies outside the health sector by approximately 0.4% – trends, which in turn, increased deaths by opioid overdose and suicide. Zack Cooper, a Yale economist and one of the co-authors of that paper, argues that consolidation has its most pernicious effects in areas like north-eastern Indiana and north-western Ohio, where Parkview has established itself as the dominant player: semi-rural parts of the country which already had comparatively few healthcare providers and are even more vulnerable to consolidation and price hikes. “That’s where you start to see these 10 to 15% price increases over time,” said Cooper. “Outside of New York, LA, Chicago and Houston, often the hospitals are really the biggest employers in town. They’ve got these beautiful campuses and rolling grass lawns, and you say, ‘Oh gosh, this is good for the economy.’ But what we’re starting to see is that many of our local health systems are boa constrictors just tightening around and squeezing the life of some of these local economies.”
The not-for-profit cut services. Then a young mother diedParkview Health is now north-eastern Indiana’s largest employer. And as the hospital system has grown, it has refashioned greater Fort Wayne in its own image.
Parkview has built its own police force with dozens of armed officers stationed across the region. It has stuck its green and gray colors on the jerseys of Fort Wayne’s minor league baseball team, and paid millions to call their downtown stadium, “Parkview Field”. Today, even the local hockey rink, “SportOne Parkview Icehouse”, and a local YMCA, “Parkview Family YMCA”, pay homage to the not-for-profit.
‘Parkview Field’View image in fullscreenParkview paid millions to call Fort Wayne’s minor league baseball stadium ‘Parkview Field’. Photograph: George Joseph/The GuardianIn Fort Wayne and its surrounding deep-red counties, business leaders and Republican state lawmakers have grumbled for years about Parkview’s high prices – including several who spoke on the condition of anonymity for this story. But no major establishment figure has been willing to cross the hospital.
Last summer, the biggest ever local challenge to the not-for-profit’s carefully cultivated reputation came not from elected officials, but a spontaneous coalition of suburban and rural mothers from DeKalb county. The women, calling themselves “Moms Against Parkview”, were upset that the healthcare system had decided to shut down the labor and delivery unit at their local formerly independent hospital, which the system had absorbed and rechristened as “Parkview DeKalb” in 2019. In a statement to the media, the prosperous not-for-profit likened itself to the hundreds of struggling rural hospitals nationwide that have cut maternal care services: “Across the country, rural hospitals have experienced ongoing challenges in ensuring sustainable access to high-quality obstetrics services.”
The protesters didn’t buy this explanation, which they assumed was a convenient excuse for Parkview to slash a money-losing service line. Standing at an intersection near the gargantuan Regional Medical Center last September, several women and their children held handmade signs, declaring in scrawled marker: “Save DeKalbs OB Unit” and “Parkview puts $$$ over mothers!”
Two women hold signs during a protest against Parkview Health.View image in fullscreenJennifer Vian and Michelle Dunn hold signs from protests they organized last year against Parkview Health. Photograph: George Joseph/The GuardianThat month, Michelle Dunn, one of the protesters, submitted an anonymous letter to a local newspaper, which she told the Guardian she had received from a nurse working at Parkview Dekalb. “Shutting our unit down would be detrimental to women and their children especially when they cannot make it to Parkview Regional,” the letter stated.
Parkview executives largely ignored the women. A few weeks later, the anonymous writer’s warning proved prescient. Late in the day on 10 October 2023, a 26-year-old named Taysha Wilkinson-Sobieski showed up at Parkview DeKalb looking pale, according to one current and one former hospital source.
Parkview hadn’t approved 24/7 onsite ultrasound coverage – a basic medical imaging tool – at the outlying hospital, according to two former Parkview employees with knowledge of the incident. But because of her vitals, the two former employees said, staff suspected she was bleeding internally due to an ectopic pregnancy, a potentially life-threatening condition in which an egg grows outside of the uterus.
Even after the closure of the labor and delivery unit, Parkview Dekalb still had OB-GYNs who did pre-scheduled procedures and an on-call general surgeon who had the technical skills to try and help Wilkinson-Sobieski, two current and two former Parkview employees told the Guardian.
But alongside the publicly-announced unit closure, hospital executives had also quietly slashed on-call OB-GYN emergency coverage at Parkview DeKalb, so the de facto practice became for staff to transfer pregnancy-related emergencies to Parkview Regional Medical Center, a 20-minute drive away, one current employee and one former high-ranking Parkview employee with knowledge of the matter said.
A woman carrying a babyTaysha Wilkinson-Sobieski, 26, died after Parkview Health transferred her away from her local hospital. She left behind her husband and a one-year-old son. Photograph: Courtesy of Wilkinson-Sobieski’s familyThe transfer cost Wilkinson-Sobieski time she could not afford. When the young woman arrived at the regional hub, she was still conscious and doctors were waiting for her, according to a source familiar with her post-transfer care. Staff ran an ultrasound, put her to sleep with anesthesia, and began an operation to put a clamp across one of her fallopian tubes, which by this point had ruptured, the source said.
They got to her too late. She had already lost too much blood. She never woke up again, the source said.
Wilkinson-Sobieski was pronounced dead two days later. She left behind her husband Clayton and their one-year-old son, Reid.
Afterwards, her family received a bill from Parkview, according to her husband and another person familiar with the matter.
Parkview did not respond to numerous detailed questions from the Guardian about the sources’ claims regarding the case, and declined to comment for a previous story about the case in the Indianapolis Star.
In a previous statement to local press about its OB-GYN service cuts, Parkview said its “unwavering commitment to healthy moms and babies” was at “the heart” of its new approach, which it claimed would create “new opportunities to optimize prenatal care, labor and delivery, and postnatal care”.
But current and former Parkview employees told the Guardian the case points to the dangers of treating medicine like a business.
“What do you do about the ectopic? What do you do about the mom that comes in with a foot hanging out?” said one current longtime medical provider at Parkview, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “At the end of the day, that’s why the practitioners routinely say, ‘This cannot be quantified.’ Medicine does not fit neatly into an excel spreadsheet.”
The duo that built ‘Emerald City’With a price tag of over $600m, Parkview’s Regional Medical Center – a campus of brick walls and glass panes – is one of the most expensive developments in north-eastern Indiana.
When patients walk through the sliding doors of its main entrance, they enter a bright atrium. Light floods through the front windows, revealing its immaculate floors and a grayscale glass mural that includes engravings of surgery staff and a motto in cursive: “Generosity Heals.”
This is the house that Parkview built – and that the patients and employers of greater Fort Wayne paid for with some of the highest prices across the land.
Parkview’s Regional Medical CenterView image in fullscreenParkview’s Regional Medical Center, a campus of brick walls and glass panes, is one of the most expensive developments in north-eastern Indiana. Photograph: Rachel Von Art/The GuardianThe ever-expanding campus was a crowning achievement for Parkview’s longtime CEO, Michael Packnett, who retired two years ago, having turned the system from a small community chain into a regional powerhouse. During his 16-year tenure, Packnett, a doughy-faced Oklahoman with a soft voice and a graying widow’s peak, won near universal acclaim for his carefully-cultivated brand of “servant leadership”.
Former employees, from nurses to executive team leaders, reminisce about how Packnett would walk the halls and shake the hands of subordinates, whom he called “co-workers” in public pronouncements. Even today, local critics of the hospital find it hard to believe Packnett could have been in the know about the hospital’s more controversial charging and acquisition tactics. What they don’t like, they sometimes ascribe to Rick Henvey, Packnett’s longtime deputy and eventual successor. Henvey, a balding Texas native with a taut face, does not project Packnett’s “care bear” image, as one Republican lawmaker put it.
But sources who dealt with both over their 23-year partnership say that, in their business practices, the two were closely aligned. Henvey followed Packnett to Fort Wayne. What they built there, one of the wealthiest hospital systems in Indiana, they built together – a trajectory that was not inevitable. When the duo took over Parkview in 2006, Fort Wayne – then a city of around 250,000 – had a relatively competitive hospital market. Parkview had a slightly smaller regional market share than a for-profit competitor, and struggled with wobbly revenues, tough dealings with insurers, and a lack of bed capacity – causing it to sometimes lose patient referrals to its rival.
With the arrival of Packnett and Henvey, the hospitals’ operating revenues exploded, rising from around $700m at the close of 2006 to $1bn by the end of 2011 – a 40%-plus increase, though patient admissions only grew 11% during that period, according to Moody’s Ratings reports from the time. Hospital industry rivals and insurance sources attribute a large part of Packnett’s success in those early days to his team’s aggressive acquisition of dozens of freestanding medical facilities, including doctors’ offices, imaging sites and surgery centers.
Like many hospital leaders across the country, Parkview administrators sometimes reclassified these acquisitions as “hospital-based” outpatient departments, according to one former Parkview employee and two healthcare industry sources familiar with the matter. The reclassifications didn’t fundamentally change the services offered and the facilities were not necessarily on Parkview hospital campuses, sources asserted, but thanks to lax Medicare and commercial insurance reimbursement practices, administrators could insert the hospital’s tax identification number, a hospital address, and higher charges onto bills from these sites.
“So Packnett shows up here from Oklahoma and he realizes he has unlimited dollars,” recalled one rival hospital executive, who was operating in Fort Wayne at the time.
Around 2010, Packnett and Henvey saw an opportunity for this kind of billing arbitrage across state lines in Bryan, Ohio. The town of less than 10,000 people had a small community hospital that was fighting to keep its independence as well as an aging doctors group that was looking to cash out.
Packnett and Henvey wanted both, according to the Bryan hospital’s then CEO Phil Ennen. But when the duo couldn’t convince the local hospital to surrender, they settled for the doctors’ practice, which had its own facility doing affordable imaging and lab work right across the street. Then the Fort Wayne not-for-profit executives jacked up prices, Ennen recalls.
Suddenly, he said, patients in Bryan receiving imaging from the same personnel in the same facility, were on the hook for hundreds of dollars more in charges because of its hospital-based reclassification, a spike that sparked complaints from local employers. “It’s a powerful aphrodisiac, right?” said Ennen. “We can take ’em over and take their lab and their X-ray and make it ours, and charge our prices.” Packnett’s physician grabs also softened up hospital targets for poaching down the line, according to one former high-level Parkview employee. With the Bryan doctors’ group now in Parkview’s hands, Ennen noted, the system began siphoning referrals away from the Ohio community hospital – shifting hospital facility fees and future patient visits from Bryan west to Fort Wayne.
Thirteen years later, struggling with finances, the community hospital group that operated the hospital in Bryan and another one in a nearby small town finally gave in and joined Parkview.
“They put Parkview doctors in Ohio and took their volume away,” recalled the former high-ranking Parkview employee. “It was a slow bleed.”
Announcing the affiliation, Tasha Eicher, Parkview’s market president for north-east Indiana and Ohio, said the system looked forward to “seeing the impact” it could have as “both a healthcare provider and a community partner”.
‘The more you code, the higher you code, the more credit you get’As Parkview took over formerly independent county hospitals and doctors’ offices, more and more patients were referred within its system, exposing them to the not-for-profit’s meticulous revenue strategies.
Within a few years of Parkview’s acquisition of the formerly independent community hospital in DeKalb county, Indiana, in 2019, managers there were ranking doctors by revenue metrics, holding meetings about which practitioners had failed to hit their expected financials, and basing their bonus pay, in large part, on patient volume and new patient encounters, internal documents show.
A pedestrian walks into the Parkview Regional Medical Center in Fort Wayne, Ind., Thursday, Oct.10, 2024.View image in fullscreenFive former employees said that Parkview’s pay structure incentivized some practitioners to steer patients toward costly procedures and testing. Photograph: Rachel Von Art/The GuardianFive former Parkview employees interviewed for this story asserted that this pay structure incentivized some practitioners to churn through dozens of patients a day and to steer them toward costly procedures and testing.
“The more you code, the higher you code, the more credit you get, which would translate to bonuses,” said one former Parkview office manager, who worked in the system for more than a decade.
“Somebody comes in with knee arthritis and basically they’re having pain, but they haven’t had any other treatment,” recalled a former Parkview doctor, questioning how his colleagues weighed surgeries versus more conservative alternatives. “These guys will jump right to a knee replacement surgery.”
Revenue pressure was even brought down to the level of nurses – some of whom say they have been pushed to charge for the smallest of items from Kleenexes to batteries. One 2022 email, obtained by the Guardian, shows a supervisor at Parkview DeKalb telling nurses that she had reviewed their charts for the week and found they had “missed” $50,000 in charges as a team. The following year, managers told staff to be more stringent about how many linen towels they handed out to patients – an initiative they termed “linen stewardship”.
“It makes me feel disgusting. It makes me feel dirty,” said one current Parkview nurse, describing how staff have been made to charge for supplies and services down to the micro-level. “Why should I be trying to make sure that they’re getting the most money that they can?” In some cases, these volume and coding protocols resulted in enormous bills and significant additional revenue for the system, according to medical and legal records reviewed by the Guardian.
In 2021, after a young girl went to the ER for an accidental razor cut, a doctor applied an “adhesive skin affix”, a special type of wound glue, on her finger for about 10 seconds, according to her mother. Afterwards, Parkview charged just over $85 for the glue capsule, about four to five times the price listed online. The hospital also tacked another $295 onto the bill for the labor, which it classified as an intermediate surgical procedure, according to paperwork reviewed by the Guardian.
In 2022, Indiana’s attorney general announced a $2.9m overbilling settlement with Parkview, which stemmed from allegations that staff at multiple hospital locations were using improper revenue codes for blood-clotting tests to score more Medicaid dollars. In a statement to local press, Parkview said it believed it was “using the correct billing code” and denied any wrongdoing.
The system has also previously argued it needs to “maintain a strong, stable financial position” in order to provide millions of dollars in charity care to poor patients, though such charitable figures are themselves based on the system’s high prices.
‘Take my pricing or no deal’Under Packnett, Parkview’s growing ring of hospitals increased its leverage in contract negotiations with health insurers. Parkview had facilities that insurance companies effectively needed for their network plans in the Fort Wayne region, especially since local employers were afraid of making their workers leave their beloved chain, the one that had put its name on the local minor league baseball field and the local Y, according to two former Parkview employees and two Indiana insurance industry sources.
“The hospital was like, ‘Take my pricing or no deal’,” recalled one former Parkview employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the confidential nature of hospital-insurance bargaining.
Marty Wood, president of the Insurance Institute of Indiana, a lobbying group, told the Guardian that Parkview has been known to force insurance companies in negotiations to accept “all or nothing” agreements as part of their contracts. “All or nothing” agreements make insurers keep all of a system’s hospitals in their networks, regardless of their quality or costs – an arrangement that the California attorney general’s office and class action attorneys in other parts of the country have investigated as part of antitrust cases. “That has absolutely got to drive up the overall costs,” Wood said. Parkview did not respond to questions about whether it used “all or nothing” agreements. With this growing bargaining power, Parkview secured higher and higher payments from private health insurers throughout the 2010s.
A view of Fort Wayne, IndianaView image in fullscreenFort Wayne, Indiana, a mid-sized, midwestern city. As Parkview’s hospital system has grown, it has refashioned greater Fort Wayne in its own image. Photograph: Rachel Von Art/The GuardianIn 2011, commercial insurers were paying an estimated 233% of what the federal government was paying Parkview for the same services through Medicare. By 2019, that number had shot up to 282%. The same year, Packnett took home more in annual compensation than he ever had previously from the not-for-profit: $3.8m.
The escalating costs sparked growing consternation among local employers. That May, the Employers’ Forum of Indiana released a study it had commissioned that found the once obscure regional system had some of the highest hospital prices in the country. Gloria Sachdev, the employer alliance’s president, said Parkview had not taken her up on her offer to meet before its release, but after the New York Times reported on their findings, Packnett invited her to come in from Indianapolis suburbs and discuss the study.
So one morning that May, Sachdev drove into Fort Wayne, past the corn fields, hospital billboards, and the minor league baseball stadium named after Parkview. Around 11am, she found herself at the head of a conference table inside the hospital’s regional center, where c-suite leaders grilled her with methodological questions and expounded on their civic-minded efforts.
After feeling like they had been going in circles for hours, Sachdev abruptly ended the meeting.
“Your job is not to provide revenue for the baseball field,” she recalls blurting out to the hospital executives. “Your job is not to provide revenue for the community outside of healthcare. Your job is to provide the best healthcare you can at an affordable price.” Afterwards, Packnett, who had mostly stayed silent, offered to walk her out. As the two stood in the regional center’s airy atrium, Sachdev said, the hospital CEO asked for her advice.
“His concern was not about the prices. It was not about the impact to the community,” Sachdev recalled. “It was about being in the New York Times and how he should manage that.”
Sachdev says she urged Packett to be a local hero by lowering his chain’s prices. The national news cycle, she told him, was short.
Packnett nodded and looked relieved, she said.
The following year, Anthem, the area’s largest commercial health insurer, used Sachdev’s price study to bargain hard with Parkview, and secured temporary reimbursement reductions. In 2021 and 2022, average prices at Parkview hospitals dropped out of the nation’s top 10% most expensive hospitals. But in 2023, the system’s average prices climbed once again into the top 10%.
“To put it bluntly, I don’t think they were committed and acting in good faith,” Sachdev said of Parkview. “They gave a concession just to pacify people, then they just raised their prices again.”
A Guardian analysis of price transparency data from Parkview’s Regional Medical Center found that prices increased at the flagship hospital in 2024. The Guardian US compared the cost of nearly 500 in-patient medical procedures in 2023 and 2024 and found that private insurance companies with more than 10 covered procedures saw an average price increase of 20% between 2023 and 2024. The Guardian’s analysis also showed just how much costs could swing at Parkview depending on a patient’s coverage. ​​Parkview negotiates the cost of each procedure with each insurance company and on average, the difference between the maximum and minimum negotiated price varies by $30,000.
Graph of the price variation for procedures at Parkview Regional Medical CenterWood, the insurance lobbyist, called the spread “outrageous” and said it suggested that much of what determines hospital rates comes down to negotiating power, rather than real world costs. “How can that be for the same thing? It makes no sense,” Wood said, referring to the differing procedure costs. “They’re forcing the hand of certain payors to pay this much or not be part of their network. That’s all I can think of.” Parkview did not respond to the Guardian’s request to explain its price variations.
‘She could have easily died’The October 2023 death of Taysha Wilkinson-Sobieski – the young mother who had an ectopic pregnancy – did not spur change at Parkview’s outlying hospitals. In the months that followed, according to one current and one former employee, Parkview hospital administrators did not restore OB-GYN emergency coverage service to two of its smaller hospitals: Parkview LaGrange and Parkview DeKalb, the local hospital Wilkinson-Sobieski had gone to for help. Nor did they make sure that the facilities had 24/7 ultrasound service – a level of service that is only provided at the regional center, according to internal hospital records from earlier this year obtained by the Guardian. On New Year’s day, less than three months after Wilkinson-Sobieski’s death, another woman who did not know she had an ectopic pregnancy walked through the doors of the ER at Parkview Dekalb.
The emergency room entrance at Parkview Regional Medical CenterView image in fullscreenThe emergency room entrance at Parkview Regional Medical Center. Photograph: Rachel Von Art/The GuardianFor most of that day, Melanie Boterf, 33, had felt nauseous. She was having trouble breathing and felt pain between her hips. Worried about incurring a bill for her family, the stay-at-home mom had tried to sleep it off. But after she went to the bathroom and saw blood in her underwear, she drove to her local ER, leaving her husband, a sanitation truck driver, to watch the kids before his early shift the next morning. As in Wilkinson-Sobieski’s case, Parkview DeKalb lacked ultrasound capabilities at night and OB-GYN emergency coverage – limiting the staff’s ability to confirm whether Boterf had an ectopic pregnancy and to care for her if that was the case, according to medical records and a current Parkview employee. The ER doctor at DeKalb that night decided to transfer her, telling her it was because they couldn’t run an ultrasound, Boterf recalls.
Boterf says she was shocked. She had come to her local emergency room after all.
“The moment that they told me I’m not getting imaging here and I need to be transferred, I’m like, ‘Ok what’s the point of this being a hospital then?’”
At Parkview’s Regional Medical Center, Boterf, whose vitals had stabilized, waited more than two-and-a-half hours to be operated on. By the time the team ran her ultrasound, the imaging suggested that she had suffered a “moderate to large” hemorrhage within her pelvis, an indication that one of her fallopian tubes might have ruptured, medical records show.
Fortunately for Boterf, afterwards a Parkview surgeon was able to stop her internal bleeding and save her life. But several medical experts interviewed for this story pointed out that the case could have ended differently. It was impossible to know when exactly Boterf’s tube was going to burst, they said. If it had happened during her transfer, the experts said, she may not have survived.
A woman and a child at a tableView image in fullscreenMelanie Boterf went to the ER at Parkview Dekalb, which lacked ultrasound capabilities at night and OB-GYN emergency coverage, and had to be transferred to Parkview’s Regional Medical Center. ‘She could have easily died in that ambulance going from hospital A to hospital B,’ a doctor said. Photograph: George Joseph/The Guardian“You can’t predict when it’s going to happen. If it had happened on the truck she could have died,” said a medical source, who used to work at Parkview DeKalb. “It’s like you’re filling a water balloon. It keeps going and just goes ‘pow!’ Then the hose is still going to bleed.”
“She could have easily died in that ambulance going from hospital A to hospital B,” said Dr Larry Melniker, an ultrasound expert and vice chief of quality at New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital’s Department of Emergency Medicine.
In an internal meeting ahead of Parkview DeKalb’s OB-GYN service cuts last year, hospital leaders claimed they had tried their best to recruit OB-GYNs, but had been struggling to find enough providers to maintain the same level of services, according to an audio recording obtained by the Guardian. “Healthcare is just rapidly changing,” one executive told staff, in an apparent nod to the national OB-GYN shortage. “We’re not alone in this.”
Some sources questioned this line. They point out that unlike struggling rural hospitals, Parkview has a deep bench of OB-GYNs at its main regional campus and that the cuts allowed the system to skimp on a low-reimbursement service line.
Despite their resources, higher ups have not been willing to make more of their OB-GYN physicians take call shifts at their semi-rural hospitals while investing enough to attract additional recruits there, according to two former high-ranking Parkview employees.
The same month Wilkinson-Sobieski died, Parkview announced it had absorbed the community hospital in Bryan, Ohio, along with two other medical facilities on that side of the Indiana-Ohio border.
This fiscal year it found roughly $140m to pour into capital projects across greater Fort Wayne – investments that, a Moody’s report from July noted, will help further its goal of regional expansion.
The not-for-profit has enough resources to recruit more OB-GYNs for their outlying hospitals, one of the former high-ranking Parkview employees argued.
“They have the money,” she said. “They just don’t want to spend it.”
Jules Feeney and Aaron Mendelson contributed to this story
Methodology boxThe Guardian analyzed Parkview hospital prices using two different data sources. We used a metric called the commercial to Medicare cost ratio to analyze how pricey Parkview hospitals are compared to other hospitals around the country. This metric is an estimate of how much more a hospital charges private health insurance compared with what it charges Medicare and is based on records submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. The Guardian identified Parkview hospitals for each year from 2011 to 2023, and took each hospital’s commercial to Medicare ratio from processed data available from the RAND Corporation. The Guardian found the 90th percentile commercial to Medicare estimate by analyzing every general hospital, an approach adapted from this research paper.
The cost of individual inpatient procedures are based on 2023 and 2024 hospital price transparency files from Parkview Regional Medical Center. The Guardian matched every procedure based on the name of the insurer and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid classification number. We matched 484 different medical procedure codes for 14 insurance companies and found four private insurance companies with more than 10 inpatient procedures in both 2023 and 2024, plus additional Medicare and Medicaid plans. We only compared the cost of one procedure for one insurer in each year to ensure an accurate year-to-year comparison.

Copyright © 2024 WYD APP

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

Kussbrothers News | WYD APP | YA-News | GoLuckGame